Davy Brion has posted some rants about the Microsoft MVP program and the type of people that are attracted to it. What David has mentioned holds true in some other areas of IT industry too. "Architect" another cool but severely abused title :) If you take David's post and replace "Microsoft MVP" with the word "Architect" you would find everything still holds true. I am a strong believer that "Architect" as a designation\title should be done away with. In my 8+ years of IT experience I have seen quite a few of this breed :) With exception of few I found most of them just good with UML modelling tools (such as Visio) Generating high quality project artifacts (Such as Function Specs, Design documents) Buzz word mongers. Smooth talkers These maybe important qualities to have in an Architect but a sound technical background is a non negotiable. Everyone knows what is the end result if you engage such people. Such Architects most...
My experiments with technology !